For philanthropy and NGOs
Grant targeting runs on deficit metrics — poverty rate, unemployment — that describe what a community lacks. They say nothing about what it already has to build on.
You are trying to decide where investment does the most good. The data you are usually handed to make that call is a deficit map — poverty rate, unemployment, median income shortfalls, all the ways a place falls short of a benchmark. Deficit metrics are good at telling you where the need is. They are silent on the question that actually determines whether an investment lands: what does this community already have to build on.
That silence has a cost. Two communities can show the same poverty rate and have opposite capacity to absorb a grant — one with civic infrastructure, housing stock, and household balance sheets that can carry new investment forward, the other without. A ranking built purely on deficit tends to reward the symptom and miss the substrate, funding communities that look similar on paper but respond very differently once the money arrives. None of that shows up in the metrics you are targeting with.
FAND builds the other half of the picture: what a community owns, what it owes, and the trust infrastructure in between, using the same balance-sheet identity that runs for 200+ of the 237 economies and extends down through states to counties. The subnational figures are provisional and say so on their face — every number carries an honesty badge, and the watermark travels with every export. For a targeting decision, that is the point: a labeled draft of a community’s actual capacity is worth more than a confident deficit number that can’t tell you whether the investment will take root.
Start with the shape of one: Duval County, Florida — a labelled sample panel showing how a county ledger is assembled, with its provenance on every row. Then find the community you fund in the Where-Tree. Then read the finding this pathway exists to deliver: the better predictor of a community’s hidden wealth isn’t how much need it shows, it’s how much capacity it already has to participate.
Start here
-
Duval County, FL — county annex Experimental
Provisional subnational figures — the honesty badge and watermark travel with every number. Not for grant-decision citation.
-
Featured essay — Capacity, Not Uptake
The finding this pathway is built around: the opportunity to participate tracks a community's hidden wealth better than participation itself.
Related pages
- Where-Tree explorer Experimental — The collapsible world → country → state → county hierarchy. Find the community you fund.
- US counties — commuter flows dominate — Why county-level production metrics misattribute value, and what that means for reading a target community's numbers.
- Five spatial scales — The same balance-sheet identity from country down to block group — useful when a program spans jurisdictions.
Talk to us about your target communities
We are building county coverage from courthouse records and administrative rolls. If you can tell us where your target communities' records live — or what a community ledger would need to say before you could use it in a targeting decision — that conversation shortens the work.